====== Official PFT Guides ====== ^Official Guides^ | [[https://www.thoracic.org/professionals/career-development/ats-virtual-network/resources/2021-rbc-pft-interpretation-card.pdf|ATS Rapid Interpretation Guide]]| |[[https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/GOLD_Spirometry_2010.pdf | 2010 GOLD Spirometry Guide]]| |[[https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01499-2021 | 2022 ERS/ATS Interpretive Strategies for PFTs]]| ====== Interpretation Position ====== ==== Why I use GOLD Criteria ==== At UMMC, PFTs do report LLN and reference value (pop mean?) but not percentiles or z scores. One can back-calculate the SD using $\sigma = \frac{LLN - ref}{-1.65}$ (this assumed LLN on our reports corresponds to 5th percentile). Once $\sigma$ is known for the each value (e.g., $\sigma_{FVC} \neq \sigma_{FEV1} \neq \sigma_{RV}$), you could then use $z = \frac{PT_{value} - ref}{\sigma}$ and refer to the tables below to grade severity. Given the complexity of this, using ERS/ATS for diagnosing and grading abnormalities is not possible. Therefore, I use GOLD criteria. ====== Step-by-Step to Interpreting PFTs ====== ===== Assess Flow-Volume Loops ===== - Are the loops similar between attempts? - YES: Skip to next - NO: See first page's comment if ATS reproducibility criteria was met - Roughly speaking, do the loops appear obstructive or restrictive? ===== Assess Spirometry ===== ==== Spirometric Severity ==== === ATS Criteria === [[https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/erj/60/1/2101499.full.pdf | Source]] ^ Grade ^ FEV1 z score ^ Severity ^ | NA | −1.65 to −2.5 | Mild | | NA | −2.51 to −4.0 | Moderate | | NA | <−4.1 | Severe | === GOLD Criteria === [[https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/GOLD_Spirometry_2010.pdf | Source]] ^ Grade ^ FEV1 Percent Predicted ^ Severity ^ | 1 | ≥80% | Mild | | 2 | 50% − 79% | Moderate | | 3 | 30% − 49% | Severe | | 4 | <30% or <50% with CHRF | Very Severe | ==== Bronchodilator Response ==== === ERS/ATS Definition === - Required: - BDR >10% - Calculation - $ BDR = \frac{FEV1_{postBD} - FEV1_{preBD}}{FEV1_{predicted}}$ **Important NOTE:** - Calculation is __not__ - $ BDR = \frac{FEV1_{postBD} - FEV1_{preBD}}{FEV1_{preBD}}$ - Does NOT require - $\Delta FEV1_{volume} >200 mL$ === GOLD Definition === - Required: - $BDR >12%$ - $\Delta FEV1_{volume} \geq 200 mL$ - Calculation - $ BDR = \frac{FEV1_{postBD} - FEV1_{preBD}}{FEV1_{preBD}}$ - **NOTE: this differs from ERS/ATS calculation** ==== Methacholine Challenge ==== [[https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01526-2016 | Source, ERS 2017]] ===Response Categorization === {{:resources:pulm:methacholine_response.png?900|}} === Testing Protocol === {{:resources:pulm:methacholine_challenge.png?600|}} ===== DLCO Severity===== === ERS / ATS Definition === {{:resources:pulm:ats_dlco.png?600|}} [[https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/erj/60/1/2101499.full.pdf | Source]] ^ Grade ^ FEV1 z score ^ Severity ^ | NA | −1.65 to −2.5 | Mild | | NA | −2.51 to −4.0 | Moderate | | NA | <−4.1 | Severe | ===Gold Definition=== ^ DLCO Percent Predicted ^ Severity ^ |>140% | Abnormally High | |76%-140% | Normal | |61-75% | Mild | |41-60% | Moderate | |<40% | Severe | ===== Assessing Restriction ===== === ATS Criteria === [[https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/erj/60/1/2101499.full.pdf | Source, pg 17]] - Check spiro - Is $FVC \cdot z_{score} \leq -1.65$ (//e.g.// < 5th percentile)? - Yes: get lung volumes - No: no restriction - Check lung volumes - Is $TLC \cdot z_{score} \leq -1.65$ (//e.g.// < 5th percentile)? {{:resources:pulm:ats_restriction.png?600|}} [[https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/erj/60/1/2101499.full.pdf | Source]] ^ Grade ^ FEV1 z score ^ Severity ^ | NA | −1.65 to −2.5 | Mild | | NA | −2.51 to −4.0 | Moderate | | NA | <−4.1 | Severe === GOLD Definition === - Required: - FVC <80% predicted ^TLC Percent Predicted^Severity^ |>70% | Mild | |50%-69% | Moderate | |<50% | Severe | ===== Other Lung Volumes ===== VC: ↓ in restriction, ↓ in air trapping RV & FRC: ↑ with air trapping RV & FRC: ↓ with restriction ERV: ↓ in obesity ==== Lung Volume ==== FRC is the primary thing calculated in lung volume calculations. ===== Other ===== === Plethysmography === **Boyle’s Law** * $P_1V_1 = P_2V_2$ * $\implies V_{tg} = 970\frac{\Delta V}{\Delta P}$ $ FRC = ERV + RV $ $TLC = VC + RV $ === Helium === * Helium is used because He doesn’t cross the alveolar-capillary membrane * $ C_1V_1 = C_2(V_1+V_2)$ * $\implies V_2 = V1(\frac{C_1}{C_2}-1)$ * **limitations** since inhalation done only for a few minutes, would get into poorly ventilated lungs, so will underestimate FRC === Nitrogen === Method for calculation is similar to [[#Helium]] method.